So the Heart of the West Contest is not exactly the Olympic arena for writing, but I was hoping for Gold. Alas, I didn't even final.
Competitions seem to be one of those things that some writers advocate strongly and others don't even bother entering. I'm fast becoming one of the latter. It's not because I don't win or even final, it's just because the judging is so subjective. True, so is the entire writing world, but let me give you an example.
On the HOW contest I received 96/100, 95/100 and 84/100. Now, the first two loved it, the last didn't. And the last had some comments to say that none of my many critique partners/groups have mentioned as being any where near important. And yet, it was her score which knocked my mss out of the running.
I've come to realize that with my particular 'voice', readers often really like it or really don't. It's not the kind of writing voice that follows the usual sound of most books on the shelf. Publishers are always saying they want to hear a strong, new, innovative 'voice', but are they really willing to take a chance on something that is actually new? What if they can't sell new? What if they can't sell my writing?
Anyhow, this post is about writing competitions! As far as I'm aware, there's generally two reasons writers enter competitions. 1) Feedback/Critique. 2) If the result is good, it looks great on a query letter.
So, for me, since I'm not getting results which look 'great' on a query letter, and since I have two fantastic cps (critique partners) and a number of 'readers' who give invaluable feedback, I've decided I'm not going to bother entering any more writing competitions.
But what about you? What is your competition standpoint? Have they helped or hindered?
-Riss
9 years ago